Wednesday, August 29, 2012

ROMNEY’S MORMONISM: OFF-LIMITS FOR DISCUSSION?




ROMNEY’S MORMONISM: OFF-LIMITS FOR DISCUSSION?

By Avraham Azrieli *


*Avraham Azrieli is the author of seven books, most recently, The Mormon Candidate – A Novel.


As a candidate for the presidency, Gov. Mitt Romney has consistently declined to discuss his relationship with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (colloquially called the Mormon Church) except to say that faith has played a central role in his life and success. This coyness, in the context of the Mormon Church’s traditional secrecy as to its temple rituals and financial activities, has intensified public interest. The conflict is certain to heat up as the elections approach, and perhaps worsen should he become president. Is Romney correct that his Mormonism belongs in a private sphere, or are voters entitled to details of his religious commitments and beliefs?

No Religious Test for Office:

American separation of church and state, and the resulting live-and-let-live religious co-existence, are inherent to our civility and national success. The Mormon Church, despite its early history of violent confrontations, and besides its lingering polygamous sub-denominations, has evolved successfully into a rich and powerful organization. Its temples tower over major cities, its charitable operations spring into action during natural disasters, and its members participate prominently in American business and political life. While Romney is the first Mormon to be nominated by a major party for President, other Mormons have served honorably in top cabinet and legislative positions, including Harry Reid as the current Majority Leader in the Senate.

In fact, having most recently elected an African-American president, U.S. voters’ pluralism needs no further proof. The constitution unequivocally states that religious affiliation shall not be a test for government service. The White House has been occupied by Anglicans, Unitarians, and Protestants of various denominations, as well as by a Catholic and a Quaker. There is no legal or moral barrier to preclude the presidency from a Mormon candidate or, for that matter, a Seventh-day Adventist, a Scientologist, or a Jehovah’s Witness.

Eligibility, therefore, is not the issue. This is about the voters’ right to know vs. the candidate’s right to privacy. More specifically, are questions about Romney’s religious positions and his ecclesiastical priesthood jobs smack of religious bias, or are they legitimate subjects for voters’ inquiry and consideration?

Is Romney Different?

Two substantive differences distinguish Romney from past presidential candidates. The first has to do with the seniority of his priesthood position within the Mormon Church hierarchy, the second with his level of adherence to specific theological doctrines that differ from mainstream American values.

Romney’s Uniqueness:

Romney is the first presidential candidate in U.S. history to have served in senior ecclesiastical positions, rising to “Stake President” – the chief priest over all the Mormons in the Boston region – a position equivalent to a Catholic archbishop. Unlike the rank-and-file church members, archbishop-level prelates in all faiths reach these positions after decades of wholehearted commitment to church theology, conformity, and missionary success. Such deep spiritual and emotional commitments do not vanish overnight. Ecclesiastical seniority represents a lifelong pledge of total devotion to the church and embrace of every tenet of its theological dogma.

Mormonism itself presents several unique elements that stand out from modern American principles. Examples include the duty of total obedience to the president of the church (who is a “living prophet”), the paternalist rules that relegates women to subservient household roles, the LDS sacred scriptures about the evil symbolized by dark skin, and the attribution of all other Christian denominations to Satan.

As a contender for the White House who seeks the ultimate powers of Commander in Chief, doesn’t Gov. Romney owe voters a full and honest disclosure of what’s in his heart and on his mind? He admitted as much in his 2007 speech Faith in America:

"Given our grand tradition of religious tolerance and liberty, some wonder whether there are any questions regarding an aspiring candidate's religion that are appropriate. I believe there are. And I will answer them today.”

But his speech, while eloquent and inspiring, answered none of the pertinent questions with any specificity or facts.

Legitimate Questions:

There are, therefore, a few relevant questions voters may ask with respect to Gov. Romney’s commitments and beliefs.

First, is Romney still holding a high priesthood position in the Mormon Church hierarchy? What are his ongoing commitments and the scope of his apostolic roles? Is he still bound by any vows that would hinder his ability to honor the oath of the office of President? How would he act when the interests of his church conflict with the interests of his country?

Second, how does Romney reconcile those elements of Mormon theology that conflict with mainstream American values: Total obedience, which negates the cherished personal freedom our nation was born to protect, female subservience, which is offensive to the long-fought-for gender equality, skin color, which no longer serves as a measure of a person’s humanity except by bigots lurking in the darkest corners of our society, and invoking Satan in reference to other peoples’ faiths, which is something we usually hear from Teheran or Afghanistan.

Conclusion:

In fairness, all religions carry with them theological elements that have become anachronistic or odd. Mormons by and large have shown by their wholesome family lives and success in every field that they are an integral part of American society. They are entitled to unbiased respect and full participation in national leadership. Religious tolerance, avoidance of bigotry, and respect for religious freedom are at the foundation of our civilized society. But tolerance goes both ways, giving voters the right to ask difficult questions without fear of being attacked as prejudiced.

In every church system, including the LDS, strict orthodoxy is perpetuated by the senior leaders, such as Gov. Romney, who spend years studying, teaching, and enforcing old dogmas. For that reason, it would be hard to imagine JFK winning a presidential election had he been a Roman Catholic archbishop, rather than the casual congregant who publicly disagreed with his church on social issues.

American voters – especially those who are inclined to support Gov. Romney – are entitled to know his faith positions on women, race, other religions, and total obedience to the president of the Mormon Church. The candidate’s openness would clear away the fog of secrecy that has tainted his otherwise earnest campaign, and voters will appreciate his honesty as they prepare to select the nation’s next leader.

Permission: You may forward or share this article in its entirety with individuals or interested groups, or post it on public forums for open discussion. Comments may be posted on the blog section here or at:  www.AzrieliBooks.com

* Avraham Azrieli, a graduate of Columbia Law School in NYC, is the author of THE MORMON CANDIDATE – A Novel, a new political thriller based on extensive research of the Mormon Church. For interested readers, a bibliography of primary sources appears at the end of the novel.

The Mormon Candidate – A Novel by Avraham Azrieli – Initial Reviews: 

“A fast-paced political thriller that will have you wanting to turn the page until the very end … thoroughly entertaining! Weaving well-researched details of Mormon history and rituals with political intrigue, fast action and well-rounded characters, THE MORMON CANDIDATE … will leave readers wanting more.” Goodreads. 

“Many twists and turns … engaging and exciting … intertwining fact and fiction ... action-packed … the characters which simply jump off the page … great book for anyone who loves fast paced political thrillers. I highly recommend it!” Dad of Divas. 

“Born in Provo, Utah, a fifth generation Mormon … I loved reading this book, found it very true to Mormon practices. I couldn't put it down.” Pinecrest. 

“If you like reading David Baldacci and Dan Brown you will absolutely love this book! Exciting plot twists, interesting characters and well-researched and detailed historical facts … extremely quick read. This book has all the ingredients to make a Best Seller.” DeKing on Books.

 “A motorcycle accident during a veteran's ride … takes readers past politics and into the world of the Mormon Church. It is an eye-opening discovery of just what the church is about and why they choose to stay so secretive.” Book Review Bin. 

“THE MORMON CANDIDATE presents a surprisingly well-balanced view of a minority religion that has assumed far greater importance -- politically, economically, and socially -- than its limited numbers would suggest.” MalWarwickonBooks.com 

“Even the most biased reader will cheer for this protagonist who seeks the truth. Through well-researched efforts and a comprehensive supporting bibliography, Azrieli presents the shadowy world of politics, religion, and suspense … draws in the reader from the beginning … recommended reading, especially for an escape (but not too far) from current events.” Gather.com. 

“Wonderfully well written and worth every bit of time expended in reading it. I would recommend this book to any one who enjoys authors such as Dan Brown, David Baldacci and James Patterson; because Avraham Azrieli is in their league.” NewBookReview.com 

“This book goes beyond a typical political thriller to provide the reader with a new angle on the privileged few who consider themselves the best … to serve the people in the office of the president. I would recommend this book to anyone who loves political thrillers, but also to those who just love to read a good story.” Book Review Bin. 

THE MORMON CANDIDATE – A Novel by Avraham Azrieli – is available from Amazon.com, Barnes & Noble, iTunes, and everywhere books are sold. (Paperback: $14.99, E-book: $2.99)

Amazon.com link: 

http://www.amazon.com/The-Mormon-Candidate-Novel-ebook/dp/B007NZG90A/ref=tmm_kin_title_0?ie=UTF8&qid=1345560487&sr=1-2 

Barnes & Nobel link: 

http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-mormon-candidate-avraham-azrieli/1109719361?ean=9781475194517

www.AzrieliBooks.com

Saturday, July 28, 2012

Essay: Politicians and Psychopaths


Politicians and Psychopaths

By Avraham Azrieli*

Watching the news makes one wonder what illicit steroids some of our politicians ingest to build up their Olympian capacity for lying. They deny financial or sexual misconduct despite irrefutable evidence, trade stocks for personal gain while millions of Americans dig into retirement savings to survive, perpetuate paralysis when legislative action is desperately needed, and pollute our living rooms with deceitful TV campaign commercials. If uttering falsehoods with a straight face were a recognized sport, our national team would comprise exclusively of Washington politicians, jetting off to London with excellent prospects of winning gold.

As a novelist, I am always on the prowl for insight into how seemingly normal people could engage in pure malevolence. A great book on the subject is “Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us,” by Robert D. Hare, PhD. Summarizing three decades of global research by multiple psychiatrists, the book presents chilling examples of real-life psychopaths, who coldly describe their shocking actions – without remorse.

For lovers of horror films and scary novels, the image of a psychopath is immortally soiled with blood and gore. Dr. Hannibal Lecter comes to mind. But Without Conscience illuminates how prevalent the phenomenon really is. Between one and two percent of the population could be afflicted, men and women who wear a cloak of normalcy as they live and work among us. They might not dine on human liver with fava beans and nice Chianti, but they are nonetheless actively ruining the lives of family members, business associates, or large groups of unwary victims. But how can you tell a psychopath from a ‘normal’ narcissist?

Unlike other troubled individuals and criminals, psychopaths enjoy a special gift of convenient aberration: they have feelings only for themselves. Their view of the world is dominated by total egotism and lack of remorse. They are blind to others’ feelings, are unburdened by personal responsibility, and are free of society’s rules and morals. Their pathological lying is aimed at achieving selfish goals, justifying bad acts, and shifting responsibility to others, often to the victims—how convenient!

This one-dimensional perspective of total egocentricity, of caring only for Number One, is the reason psychopaths cause so much agony to others—family members and strangers—but experience no regrets or guilt. Psychopaths’ mental makeup is missing a component—the human ‘weakness’ of empathy. They are blind to other people’s pain. But leave it to the psychopath to put on a credible show of heartfelt regrets or even tearful contrition in order to regain a righteous image and continue taking advantage of gullible victims.

Because they don't feel love or hate as normal people do, psychopaths coldly use others as tools in furtherance of selfish goals, as sources of goods and services – money, power, sex, etc. Often charming and intelligent, psychopaths know the right things to say. Their lies fit together nicely, forming attractive puzzles that dazzle their victims. And because psychopaths defy the rules without embarrassment, they appear forceful, authoritative, decisive—even inspiring. Consequently, victims are often mesmerized, wholly enamored with ‘their’ psychopath, and willingly provide all that the psychopath asks of them.

Without Conscience unmasks those ruthless charmers. Dr. Hare provides checklists for examination and tools for diagnosis. But the first indication is brazen lying. A psychopath often says things that are clearly untrue and self-contradictory, yet speaks with total conviction and earnestness. And when confronted with the truth, a psychopath will change the subject, come up with new lies to defend the earlier ones, or claim to be a victim of a conspiracy.

While most psychopaths victimize others on a personal basis, Without Conscience points to another group, which in a way is even scarier than Hannibal Lecter. Could it be that our elected representatives aren’t locked in paralysis merely because of inflexible ideology? Could it be that they are not just grandstanding, self-serving, insider-trading opportunists, but something much worse? Could it be that their audacious disregard for the truth and chronic lack of shame are symptoms that require clinical examination by Dr. Hare?

Avraham Azrieli writes novels and screenplays. www.AzrieliBooks.com